روجر پنروز

(تم التحويل من Roger Penrose)
السير

روجر پنروز
Roger Penrose

OM FRS
Roger Penrose at Festival della Scienza Oct 29 2011.jpg
پنروز في 2011.
وُلِدَ8 أغسطس 1931 (العمر 93 سنة)
كولشستر، إسكس، إنگلترة
الجنسيةالمملكة المتحدة
المدرسة الأم
اللقب
الجوائز
السيرة العلمية
المجالاتالفيزياء الرياضية، الفسيفساء
الهيئات
أطروحةطرق الموتر في الهندسة الجبرية (1958)
المشرف على الدكتوراهجون تود
مشرفون أكاديميون آخرونو. ڤ. د. هودج
طلاب الدكتوراه
أثـّر على

السير روجر پنروز OM FRS (و. 8 أغسطس 1931)، هو فيزيائي رياضي ورياضي وفيلسوف علوم إنگليزي. وهو أستاذ روس بول للرياضيات في جامعة إكسفورد، زميل فخري في كلية وادام، أكسفورد، وزميل فخري في كلية سانت جون، كمبردج.

قدم پنروز اسهامات بارزة في الفيزياء الرياضية للنسبية العامة وعلم الكون. حصل على العديد من الجوائز والتكريمات، من بينها جائزة وولف في الفيزياء 1988، التي تشاركها مع ستيفن هوكنگ من أجل نظريات تفرد پنروز-هوكنگ، وجائزة نوبل في الفيزياء 2020 "لاكتشافه أن تشكل الثقب الأسود هو تنبؤ قوى لنظرية النسبية العامة"[1]، والتي حازها مناصفة مع ريناهرد گنزل وأندريا گيز لاكتشافهما جسماً مضغوطاً فائق الكتلة في مركز مجرة درب التبانة.[2]

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

السنوات المبكرة والحياة الأكاديمية

Born in Colchester, Essex, Roger Penrose is a son of psychiatrist and geneticist Lionel Penrose and Margaret Leathes,[أ] and the grandson of the physiologist John Beresford Leathes and his wife, a Russian Jew, Sonia Marie Natanson,[3][4] who had left St. Petersburg in the late 1880s.[5] His uncle was artist Roland Penrose, whose son with photographer Lee Miller is Antony Penrose. Penrose is the brother of physicist Oliver Penrose and of chess Grandmaster Jonathan Penrose. Penrose attended University College School and University College, London, where he graduated with a first class degree in mathematics. In 1955, while still a student, Penrose reintroduced the E. H. Moore generalised matrix inverse, also known as the Moore–Penrose inverse,[6] after it had been reinvented by Arne Bjerhammar in 1951. Having started research under the professor of geometry and astronomy, Sir W. V. D. Hodge, Penrose finished his PhD at St John's College, Cambridge in 1958, with a thesis on "tensor methods in algebraic geometry" under algebraist and geometer John A. Todd. He devised and popularised the Penrose triangle in the 1950s, describing it as "impossibility in its purest form", and exchanged material with the artist M. C. Escher, whose earlier depictions of impossible objects partly inspired it. Escher's Waterfall, and Ascending and Descending were in turn inspired by Penrose.[بحاجة لمصدر]

As reviewer Manjit Kumar puts it:

As a student in 1954, Penrose was attending a conference in Amsterdam when by chance he came across an exhibition of Escher's work. Soon he was trying to conjure up impossible figures of his own and discovered the tribar [see tri-bar for an image] – a triangle that looks like a real, solid three-dimensional object, but isn't. Together with his father, a physicist and mathematician, Penrose went on to design a staircase that simultaneously loops up and down. An article followed and a copy was sent to Escher. Completing a cyclical flow of creativity, the Dutch master of geometrical illusions was inspired to produce his two masterpieces.[7]

Having become a reader at Birkbeck College, London (and having had his attention drawn from pure mathematics to astrophysics by the cosmologist Dennis Sciama, then at Cambridge) it was in 1964 that, in the words of Kip Thorne of Caltech, "Roger Penrose revolutionised the mathematical tools that we use to analyse the properties of spacetime". Until then work on the curved geometry of general relativity had been confined to configurations with sufficiently high symmetry for Einstein's equations to be soluble explicitly, and there was doubt about whether such cases were typical. One approach to this issue was by the use of perturbation theory, as developed under the leadership of John Archibald Wheeler at Princeton. The other, more radically innovative, approach initiated by Penrose was to overlook the detailed geometrical structure of spacetime and instead concentrate attention just on the topology of the space, or at most its conformal structure, since it is the latter – as determined by the lay of the lightcones – that determines the trajectories of lightlike geodesics, and hence their causal relationships. The importance of Penrose's epoch-making paper "Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities"[8] was not only its result (roughly that if an object such as a dying star implodes beyond a certain point, then nothing can prevent the gravitational field getting so strong as to form some kind of singularity). It also showed a way to obtain similarly general conclusions in other contexts, notably that of the cosmological Big Bang, which he dealt with in collaboration with Dennis Sciama's most famous student, Stephen Hawking.[بحاجة لمصدر]

Predicted view from outside the event horizon of a black hole lit by a thin accretion disc

It was in the local context of gravitational collapse that the contribution of Penrose was most decisive, starting with his 1969 cosmic censorship conjecture, to the effect that any ensuing singularities would be confined within a well-behaved event horizon surrounding a hidden space-time region for which Wheeler coined the term black hole, leaving a visible exterior region with strong but finite curvature, from which some of the gravitational energy may be extractable by what is known as the Penrose process, while accretion of surrounding matter may release further energy that can account for astrophysical phenomena such as quasars.[بحاجة لمصدر]

Following up his "weak cosmic censorship hypothesis", Penrose went on, in 1979, to formulate a stronger version called the "strong censorship hypothesis". Together with the BKL conjecture and issues of nonlinear stability, settling the censorship conjectures is one of the most important outstanding problems in general relativity. Also from 1979 dates Penrose's influential Weyl curvature hypothesis on the initial conditions of the observable part of the universe and the origin of the second law of thermodynamics.[9] Penrose and James Terrell independently realised that objects travelling near the speed of light will appear to undergo a peculiar skewing or rotation. This effect has come to be called the Terrell rotation or Penrose–Terrell rotation.[10][11]

Oil painting by Urs Schmid (1995) of a Penrose tiling using fat and thin rhombi.

In 1967, Penrose invented the twistor theory which maps geometric objects in Minkowski space into the 4-dimensional complex space with the metric signature (2,2).[بحاجة لمصدر]

A Penrose tiling

Penrose is well known for his 1974 discovery of Penrose tilings, which are formed from two tiles that can only tile the plane nonperiodically, and are the first tilings to exhibit fivefold rotational symmetry. Penrose developed these ideas based on the article Deux types fondamentaux de distribution statistique[12] (1938; an English translation Two Basic Types of Statistical Distribution) by Czech geographer, demographer and statistician Jaromír Korčák. In 1984, such patterns were observed in the arrangement of atoms in quasicrystals.[13] Another noteworthy contribution is his 1971 invention of spin networks, which later came to form the geometry of spacetime in loop quantum gravity. He was influential in popularising what are commonly known as Penrose diagrams (causal diagrams).[بحاجة لمصدر]

In 1983, Penrose was invited to teach at Rice University in Houston, by the then provost Bill Gordon. He worked there from 1983 to 1987.[14]


النشاط اللاحق

الكون المبكر

WMAP image of the (extremely tiny) anisotropies in the cosmic background radiation



الفيزياء والوعي

پنروز في مؤتمر.
جزء من سلسلة عن
علم الكون الطبيعي
الكون المبكر
Backgrounds
التمدد⧼dot-separator⧽المستقبل
المكونات⧼dot-separator⧽البنية
المكونات
البنية
التجارب
العلماء
تواريخ موضوعية

Penrose has written books on the connection between fundamental physics and human (or animal) consciousness. In The Emperor's New Mind (1989), he argues that known laws of physics are inadequate to explain the phenomenon of consciousness. Penrose proposes the characteristics this new physics may have and specifies the requirements for a bridge between classical and quantum mechanics (what he calls correct quantum gravity). Penrose uses a variant of Turing's halting theorem to demonstrate that a system can be deterministic without being algorithmic. (For example, imagine a system with only two states, ON and OFF. If the system's state is ON when a given Turing machine halts and OFF when the Turing machine does not halt, then the system's state is completely determined by the machine; nevertheless, there is no algorithmic way to determine whether the Turing machine stops.)[بحاجة لمصدر]

Penrose believes that such deterministic yet non-algorithmic processes may come into play in the quantum mechanical wave function reduction, and may be harnessed by the brain. He argues that computers today are unable to have intelligence because they are algorithmically deterministic systems. He argues against the viewpoint that the rational processes of the mind are completely algorithmic and can thus be duplicated by a sufficiently complex computer. This contrasts with supporters of strong artificial intelligence, who contend that thought can be simulated algorithmically. He bases this on claims that consciousness transcends formal logic because things such as the insolubility of the halting problem and Gödel's incompleteness theorem prevent an algorithmically based system of logic from reproducing such traits of human intelligence as mathematical insight. These claims were originally espoused by the philosopher John Lucas of Merton College, Oxford.[بحاجة لمصدر]

The Penrose–Lucas argument about the implications of Gödel's incompleteness theorem for computational theories of human intelligence has been widely criticised by mathematicians, computer scientists and philosophers, and the consensus among experts in these fields seems to be that the argument fails, though different authors may choose different aspects of the argument to attack.[15] Marvin Minsky, a leading proponent of artificial intelligence, was particularly critical, stating that Penrose "tries to show, in chapter after chapter, that human thought cannot be based on any known scientific principle." Minsky's position is exactly the opposite – he believed that humans are, in fact, machines, whose functioning, although complex, is fully explainable by current physics. Minsky maintained that "one can carry that quest [for scientific explanation] too far by only seeking new basic principles instead of attacking the real detail. This is what I see in Penrose's quest for a new basic principle of physics that will account for consciousness."[16]

Penrose responded to criticism of The Emperor's New Mind with his follow up 1994 book Shadows of the Mind, and in 1997 with The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. In those works, he also combined his observations with that of anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff.

Penrose and Hameroff have argued that consciousness is the result of quantum gravity effects in microtubules, which they dubbed Orch-OR (orchestrated objective reduction). Max Tegmark, in a paper in Physical Review E,[17] calculated that the time scale of neuron firing and excitations in microtubules is slower than the decoherence time by a factor of at least 10,000,000,000. The reception of the paper is summed up by this statement in Tegmark's support: "Physicists outside the fray, such as IBM's John A. Smolin, say the calculations confirm what they had suspected all along. 'We're not working with a brain that's near absolute zero. It's reasonably unlikely that the brain evolved quantum behavior'".[18] Tegmark's paper has been widely cited by critics of the Penrose–Hameroff position.

In their reply to Tegmark's paper, also published in Physical Review E, the physicists Scott Hagan, Jack Tuszyński and Hameroff[19][20] claimed that Tegmark did not address the Orch-OR model, but instead a model of his own construction. This involved superpositions of quanta separated by 24 nm rather than the much smaller separations stipulated for Orch-OR. As a result, Hameroff's group claimed a decoherence time seven orders of magnitude greater than Tegmark's, but still well short of the 25 ms required if the quantum processing in the theory was to be linked to the 40 Hz gamma synchrony, as Orch-OR suggested. To bridge this gap, the group made a series of proposals.[بحاجة لمصدر]

They supposed that the interiors of neurons could alternate between liquid and gel states. In the gel state, it was further hypothesized that the water electrical dipoles are oriented in the same direction, along the outer edge of the microtubule tubulin subunits. Hameroff et al. proposed that this ordered water could screen any quantum coherence within the tubulin of the microtubules from the environment of the rest of the brain. Each tubulin also has a tail extending out from the microtubules, which is negatively charged, and therefore attracts positively charged ions. It is suggested that this could provide further screening. Further to this, there was a suggestion that the microtubules could be pumped into a coherent state by biochemical energy.

ملف:Penrose in University of Santiago de Compostela to picked up the Fonseca prize.jpg
Roger Penrose in the University of Santiago de Compostela to receive the Fonseca Prize.

Finally, he suggested that the configuration of the microtubule lattice might be suitable for quantum error correction, a means of holding together quantum coherence in the face of environmental interaction.[بحاجة لمصدر]

Hameroff, in a lecture in part of a Google Tech talks series exploring quantum biology, gave an overview of current research in the area, and responded to subsequent criticisms of the Orch-OR model.[21] In addition to this, a 2011 paper by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff published in the fringe Journal of Cosmology gives an updated model of their Orch-OR theory, in light of criticisms, and discusses the place of consciousness within the universe.[22]

Phillip Tetlow, although himself supportive of Penrose's views, acknowledges that Penrose's ideas about the human thought process are at present a minority view in scientific circles, citing Minsky's criticisms and quoting science journalist Charles Seife's description of Penrose as "one of a handful of scientists" who believe that the nature of consciousness suggests a quantum process.[18]

In January 2014 Hameroff and Penrose claimed that a discovery of quantum vibrations in microtubules by Anirban Bandyopadhyay of the National Institute for Materials Science in Japan[23] confirms the hypothesis of Orch-OR theory.[24] A reviewed and updated version of the theory was published along with critical commentary and debate in the March 2014 issue of Physics of Life Reviews.[25]

حياته الشخصية

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

العائلة

آراؤه الدينية

جوائز وتكريمات

روجر پنروز في إحدى محاضراته.
روجر پنروز، ريناهرد گنزل وأندريا گيز، الفائزون بجائزة نوبل للفيزياء 2020.


في 6 أكتوبر 2020، أعلنت الأكاديمية الملكية السويدية للعلوم عن الفائزين بجائزة نوبل في الفيزياء 2020. وقد منحت الجائزة مناصفة بين روجر پنروز "لاكتشافه أن تشكل الثقب الأسود هو تنبؤ قوى لنظرية النسبية العامة"[26]، وريناهرد گنزل وأندريا گيز لاكتشافهما جسماً مضغوطاً فائق الكتلة في مركز مجرة درب التبانة.[27]


أعماله

منشورات بارزة

كاتب مشارك

كتب أكاديمية

  • Techniques of Differential Topology in Relativity (1972, ISBN 0-89871-005-7)
  • Spinors and Space-Time: Volume 1, Two-Spinor Calculus and Relativistic Fields (with Wolfgang Rindler, 1987) ISBN 0-521-33707-0 (paperback)
  • Spinors and Space-Time: Volume 2, Spinor and Twistor Methods in Space-Time Geometry (with Wolfgang Rindler, 1988) (reprint), ISBN 0-521-34786-6 (paperback)

مقدمات كتب أخرى

انظر أيضاً

الهوامش

  1. ^ Penrose and his father shared mathematical concepts with Dutch graphic artist M. C. Escher which were incorporated into a lot of pieces, including Waterfall, which is based on the 'Penrose triangle', and Up and Down.

المصادر

  1. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020". NobelPrize.org (in الإنجليزية الأمريكية). Retrieved 2020-10-06.
  2. ^ "تعرف على الفائزين بجائزة نوبل في الفيزياء لعام 2020". البوابة نيوز. 2020-10-06. Retrieved 2020-10-06.
  3. ^ Brookfield, Tarah (2018-10-15). Our Voices Must Be Heard: Women and the Vote in Ontario (in الإنجليزية). UBC Press. ISBN 978-0-7748-6022-2.
  4. ^ Rudolph Peters (1958). "John Beresford Leathes. 1864–1956". Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society. 4: 185–191. doi:10.1098/rsbm.1958.0016.
  5. ^ Roger Penrose. Cycles of Time: Is It Possible to Discern the Previous Universe Through the Big Bang? at YouTube
  6. ^ Penrose, R. (1955). "A generalized inverse for matrices". Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 51 (3): 406–413. Bibcode:1955PCPS...51..406P. doi:10.1017/S0305004100030401.
  7. ^ Kumar, Manjit (15 October 2010). "Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe by Roger Penrose – review". The Guardian.
  8. ^ Penrose, Roger (January 1965). "Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities". Physical Review Letters. 14 (3): 57–59. Bibcode:1965PhRvL..14...57P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.57.
  9. ^ R. Penrose (1979). "Singularities and Time-Asymmetry". S. W. Hawking General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey: 581–638, Cambridge University Press. 
  10. ^ Terrell, James (1959). "Invisibility of the Lorentz Contraction". Physical Review. 116 (4): 1041–1045. Bibcode:1959PhRv..116.1041T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.116.1041.
  11. ^ Penrose, Roger (1959). "The Apparent Shape of a Relativistically Moving Sphere". Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 55 (1): 137–139. Bibcode:1959PCPS...55..137P. doi:10.1017/S0305004100033776.
  12. ^ Jaromír Korčák (1938): Deux types fondamentaux de distribution statistique. Prague, Comité d'organisation, Bull. de l'Institute Int'l de Statistique, vol. 3, pp. 295–299.
  13. ^ Steinhardt, Paul (1996). "New perspectives on forbidden symmetries, quasicrystals, and Penrose tilings". PNAS. 93 (25): 14267–14270. Bibcode:1996PNAS...9314267S. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.25.14267. PMC 34472. PMID 8962037.
  14. ^ "Roger Penrose at Rice, 1983–87". Rice History Corner. 22 May 2013.
  15. ^ Criticism of the Lucas/Penrose argument that intelligence can not be entirely algorithmic: Sources that indicate Penrose's argument is generally rejected: Sources that also note that different sources attack different points of the argument:
  16. ^ Marvin Minsky. "Conscious Machines." Machinery of Consciousness, Proceedings, National Research Council of Canada, 75th Anniversary Symposium on Science in Society, June 1991.
  17. ^ Tegmark, Max (2000). "The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes". Physical Review E. 61 (4): 4194–4206. arXiv:quant-ph/9907009. Bibcode:2000PhRvE..61.4194T. doi:10.1103/physreve.61.4194. PMID 11088215. S2CID 17140058.
  18. ^ أ ب Tetlow, Philip (2007). The Web's Awake: An Introduction to the Field of Web Science and the Concept of Web Life. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-470-13794-9.
  19. ^ Hagan, S.; Hameroff, S.; Tuszyński, J. (2002). "Quantum Computation in Brain Microtubules? Decoherence and Biological Feasibility". Physical Review E. 65 (6): 061901. arXiv:quant-ph/0005025. Bibcode:2002PhRvE..65f1901H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.65.061901. PMID 12188753. S2CID 11707566. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  20. ^ Hameroff, S. (2006). "Consciousness, Neurobiology and Quantum Mechanics". In Tuszynski, Jack (ed.). The Emerging Physics of Consciousness. Springer. pp. 193–253. Bibcode:2006epc..book.....T.
  21. ^ "Clarifying the Tubulin bit/qubit – Defending the Penrose-Hameroff Orch OR Model (Quantum Biology)". YouTube. 22 October 2010. Retrieved 13 August 2012.
  22. ^ Roger Penrose; Stuart Hameroff (4 July 1992). "Consciousness in the Universe: Neuroscience, Quantum Space-Time Geometry and Orch OR Theory". Journal of Cosmology. Quantumconsciousness.org. Archived from the original on 16 June 2012. Retrieved 13 August 2012. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  23. ^ "Anirban Bandyopadhyay". Retrieved 22 February 2014.
  24. ^ "Discovery of quantum vibrations in 'microtubules' inside brain neurons supports controversial theory of consciousness". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 22 February 2014.
  25. ^ S. Hameroff; R. Penrose (2014). "Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory". Physics of Life Reviews. 11 (1): 39–78. Bibcode:2014PhLRv..11...39H. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002. PMID 24070914.
  26. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020". NobelPrize.org (in الإنجليزية الأمريكية). Retrieved 2020-10-06.
  27. ^ "تعرف على الفائزين بجائزة نوبل في الفيزياء لعام 2020". البوابة نيوز. 2020-10-06. Retrieved 2020-10-06.


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

قراءات إضافية

  • Ferguson, Kitty (1991). Stephen Hawking: Quest for a Theory of Everything. Franklin Watts. ISBN 0-553-29895-X.
  • Misner, Charles; Thorne, Kip S.; Wheeler, John Archibald (1973). Gravitation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help) (See Box 34.2.)

وصلات خارجية

Wikiquote-logo.svg اقرأ اقتباسات ذات علاقة بروجر پنروز، في معرفة الاقتباس.


تمّ الاسترجاع من "https://www.marefa.org/w/index.php?title=روجر_پنروز&oldid=2938603"