تشوه مدي

Tidal locking results in the Moon rotating about its axis in about the same time it takes to orbit Earth. Except for libration effects, this results in the Moon keeping the same face turned toward Earth, as seen in the left figure. (The Moon is shown in polar view, and is not drawn to scale.) If the Moon were not rotating at all, it would alternately show its near and far sides to Earth, while moving around Earth in orbit, as shown in the right figure.
A side view of the Pluto-Charon system. Pluto and Charon are tidally locked to each other. Charon is massive enough that the barycenter of Pluto's system lies outside of Pluto; thus Pluto and Charon are sometimes considered to be a binary system.

التشوه المدي Tidal distortion أو Tidal locking هو ظاهرة تشوه شكل جرم سماوي بقوة جاذبية جرم آخر فمثلا يمكن أن يتشوه قمر صغير (تشوها ماديا) بقوة جاذبية كوكبه الأم (الاكبر عادة) ويمكن أيضا أن يقترب نجمان أحدهما من الآخر فيشوه أحدهما الآخر تشويها ماديا.


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

الآلية

If the tidal bulges on a body (green) are misaligned with the major axis (red), the tidal forces (blue) exert a net torque on that body that twists the body toward the direction of realignment


التغيرات المدارية

Tidal Locking
If rotational frequency is larger than orbital frequency, a small torque counteracting the rotation arises, eventually locking the frequencies (situation depicted in green)


Eccentric orbits

A widely spread misapprehension is that a tidally locked body permanently turns one side to its host.

— Heller et al. (2011)[1]

الحدوث

الأقمار

Due to tidal locking, the inhabitants of the central body will never be able to see the satellite's green area.

Most major moons in the Solar System − the gravitationally rounded satellites − are tidally locked with their primaries, because they orbit very closely and tidal force increases rapidly (as a cubic function) with decreasing distance.[2] Notable exceptions are the irregular outer satellites of the gas giants, which orbit much farther away than the large well-known moons.

Pluto and Charon are an extreme example of a tidal lock. Charon is a relatively large moon in comparison to its primary and also has a very close orbit. This results in Pluto and Charon being mutually tidally locked. Pluto's other moons are not tidally locked; Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra all rotate chaotically due to the influence of Charon.

The tidal locking situation for asteroid moons is largely unknown, but closely orbiting binaries are expected to be tidally locked, as well as contact binaries.

قمر الأرض

Because Earth's Moon is 1:1 tidally locked, only one side is visible from Earth.

Earth's Moon's rotation and orbital periods are tidally locked with each other, so no matter when the Moon is observed from Earth the same hemisphere of the Moon is always seen. The far side of the Moon was not seen until 1959, when photographs of most of the far side were transmitted from the Soviet spacecraft Luna 3.[3]

When the Earth is observed from the moon, the Earth does not appear to translate across the sky but appears to remain in the same place, rotating on its own axis.

Timescale

An estimate of the time for a body to become tidally locked can be obtained using the following formula:[4]

where

  • is the initial spin rate expressed in radians per second,
  • is the semi-major axis of the motion of the satellite around the planet (given by the average of the periapsis and apoapsis distances),
  • is the moment of inertia of the satellite, where is the mass of the satellite and is the mean radius of the satellite,
  • is the dissipation function of the satellite,
  • is the gravitational constant,
  • is the mass of the planet, and
  • is the tidal Love number of the satellite.

and are generally very poorly known except for the Moon, which has . For a really rough estimate it is common to take (perhaps conservatively, giving overestimated locking times), and

where

  • is the density of the satellite
  • is the surface gravity of the satellite
  • is the rigidity of the satellite. This can be roughly taken as 3×1010 N·m−2 for rocky objects and 4×109 N·m−2 for icy ones.

Even knowing the size and density of the satellite leaves many parameters that must be estimated (especially ω, Q, and μ), so that any calculated locking times obtained are expected to be inaccurate, even to factors of ten. Further, during the tidal locking phase the semi-major axis may have been significantly different from that observed nowadays due to subsequent tidal acceleration, and the locking time is extremely sensitive to this value.

Because the uncertainty is so high, the above formulas can be simplified to give a somewhat less cumbersome one. By assuming that the satellite is spherical, , and it is sensible to guess one revolution every 12 hours in the initial non-locked state (most asteroids have rotational periods between about 2 hours and about 2 days)

[بحاجة لمصدر]

with masses in kilograms, distances in meters, and in newtons per meter squared; can be roughly taken as 3×1010 N·m−2 for rocky objects and 4×109 N·m−2 for icy ones.

There is an extremely strong dependence on semi-major axis .

For the locking of a primary body to its satellite as in the case of Pluto, the satellite and primary body parameters can be swapped.

One conclusion is that, other things being equal (such as and ), a large moon will lock faster than a smaller moon at the same orbital distance from the planet because grows as the cube of the satellite radius . A possible example of this is in the Saturn system, where Hyperion is not tidally locked, whereas the larger Iapetus, which orbits at a greater distance, is. However, this is not clear cut because Hyperion also experiences strong driving from the nearby Titan, which forces its rotation to be chaotic.

The above formulae for the timescale of locking may be off by orders of magnitude, because they ignore the frequency dependence of . More importantly, they may be inapplicable to viscous binaries (double stars, or double asteroids that are rubble), because the spin–orbit dynamics of such bodies is defined mainly by their viscosity, not rigidity.[5]

List of known tidally locked bodies

Solar System

Parent body Tidally-locked satellites[6]
Sun Mercury[7][8][9] (3:2 spin–orbit resonance)
Earth Moon
Mars Phobos[10] · Deimos[11]
Jupiter Metis · Adrastea · Amalthea · Thebe · Io · Europa · Ganymede · Callisto
Saturn Pan · Atlas · Prometheus · Pandora · Epimetheus · Janus · Mimas · Enceladus · Telesto · Tethys · Calypso · Dione · Rhea · Titan · Iapetus
Uranus Miranda · Ariel · Umbriel · Titania · Oberon
Neptune Proteus · Triton[10]
Pluto Charon (Pluto is itself locked to Charon)[12]

Extra-solar

  • The most successful detection methods of exoplanets (transits and radial velocities) suffer from a clear observational bias favoring the detection of planets near the star; thus, 85% of the exoplanets detected are inside the tidal locking zone, which makes it difficult to estimate the true incidence of this phenomenon.[13] Tau Boötis is known to be locked to the close-orbiting giant planet Tau Boötis b.[14]


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Bodies likely to be locked

Solar System

Based on comparison between the likely time needed to lock a body to its primary, and the time it has been in its present orbit (comparable with the age of the Solar System for most planetary moons), a number of moons are thought to be locked. However their rotations are not known or not known enough. These are:

Probably locked to Saturn

Probably locked to Uranus

Probably locked to Neptune

خارج المجموعة الشمسية

انظر أيضا

المراجع

  1. ^ خطأ استشهاد: وسم <ref> غير صحيح؛ لا نص تم توفيره للمراجع المسماة Heller_Leconte_Barnes_2011
  2. ^ Schutz, Bernard (2003-12-04). Gravity from the Ground Up. Cambridge University Press. p. 43. ISBN 9780521455060. Retrieved 24 April 2017.
  3. ^ "Oct. 7, 1959 – Our First Look at the Far Side of the Moon". Universe Today. 2013-10-07.
  4. ^ B. Gladman; et al. (1996). "Synchronous Locking of Tidally Evolving Satellites". Icarus. 122 (1): 166–192. Bibcode:1996Icar..122..166G. doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0117. (See pages 169-170 of this article. Formula (9) is quoted here, which comes from S. J. Peale, Rotation histories of the natural satellites, in J. A. Burns, ed. (1977). Planetary Satellites. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. pp. 87–112.)
  5. ^ Efroimsky, M. (2015). "Tidal Evolution of Asteroidal Binaries. Ruled by Viscosity. Ignorant of Rigidity". The Astronomical Journal. 150 (4): 12. arXiv:1506.09157. Bibcode:2015AJ....150...98E. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/4/98. 98. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ Nobili, A. M. (April 1978), "Secular effects of tidal friction on the planet-satellite systems of the solar system", Moon and the Planets 18 (2): 203–216, doi:10.1007/BF00896743, Bibcode1978M&P....18..203N.  "The following satellites seem to corotate: Phobos and Deimos, Amalthea, Io, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto, Janus, Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, Rhea, Titan, Hyperion, Japetus, Miranda, Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon."
  7. ^ Peale, S. J. (1988), "The rotational dynamics of Mercury and the state of its core", Mercury (University of Arizona Press): 461–493, Bibcode1988merc.book..461P. 
  8. ^ Rivoldini, A.; Beuthe, M.; van Hoolst, T. (September 2010), "Past and present tidal dissipation in Mercury", European Planetary Science Congress 2010: 671, Bibcode2010epsc.conf..671R. 
  9. ^ خطأ استشهاد: وسم <ref> غير صحيح؛ لا نص تم توفيره للمراجع المسماة Noyelles2012
  10. ^ أ ب Correia, Alexandre C. M. (October 2009), "Secular Evolution of a Satellite by Tidal Effect: Application to Triton", The Astrophysical Journal Letters 704 (1): L1–L4, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/L1, Bibcode2009ApJ...704L...1C. 
  11. ^ Burns, J. A. (1978), "The dynamical evolution and origin of the Martian moons", Vistas in Astronomy 22 (2): 193–208, doi:10.1016/0083-6656(78)90015-6, Bibcode1978VA.....22..193B. 
  12. ^ خطأ استشهاد: وسم <ref> غير صحيح؛ لا نص تم توفيره للمراجع المسماة Michaely2017
  13. ^ F. J. Ballesteros; A. Fernandez-Soto; V. J. Martinez (2019). "Title: Diving into Exoplanets: Are Water Seas the Most Common?". Astrobiology. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1720.
  14. ^ خطأ استشهاد: وسم <ref> غير صحيح؛ لا نص تم توفيره للمراجع المسماة space.com
  15. ^ Vergano, Dan (2007-04-25). "Out of our world: Earthlike planet". USA Today. Retrieved 2010-05-25.
  16. ^ "Astronomers Find Most Earth-like Planet to Date". Science, USA. September 29, 2010. Archived from the original on October 2, 2010. Retrieved September 30, 2010.
  17. ^ "Gliese 581g the most Earth like planet yet discovered". The Daily Telegraph, UK. September 30, 2010. Archived from the original on October 2, 2010. Retrieved September 30, 2010.
  18. ^ "Gliese 581". Open Exoplanet Catalogue. Retrieved 16 May 2019.
  19. ^ "Gliese 581". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 16 May 2019.
  20. ^ Makarov, V. V.; Berghea, C.; Efroimsky, M. (2012). "Dynamical Evolution and Spin–Orbit Resonances of Potentially Habitable Exoplanets: The Case of GJ 581d". The Astrophysical Journal. 761 (2): 83. arXiv:1208.0814. Bibcode:2012ApJ...761...83M. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/83. 83. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  21. ^ "NASA Telescope Reveals Largest Batch of Earth-Size, Habitable-Zone Planets Around Single Star" (Press release). NASA. 22 February 2017.
  22. ^ Gillon, Michaël; Triaud, Amaury H. M. J.; Demory, Brice-Olivier; Jehin, Emmanuël; Agol, Eric; Deck, Katherine M.; Lederer, Susan M.; de Wit, Julien; Burdanov, Artem (2017-02-23). "Seven temperate terrestrial planets around the nearby ultracool dwarf star TRAPPIST-1". Nature (in الإنجليزية). 542 (7642): 456–460. arXiv:1703.01424. Bibcode:2017Natur.542..456G. doi:10.1038/nature21360. ISSN 0028-0836. PMC 5330437. PMID 28230125.

المصادر