نهر ناپو
نهر ناپو Napo river | |
---|---|
الاسم المحلي | Río Napo (إسپانية) |
الموقع | |
البلدان | |
السمات الطبيعية | |
المنبع | Cotopaxi في الأنديز |
⁃ الموقع | الإكوادو |
⁃ الإحداثيات | 0°40′S 78°25′W / 0.667°S 78.417°W |
المصب | Amazon River |
- الموقع | 70 km (43 mi) downstream from Iquitos, Loreto Region, Peru |
- الإحداثيات | 3°27′28″S 72°43′3″W / 3.45778°S 72.71750°W |
الطول | 1,130 كم[1] |
مساحة الحوض | 103,307.79 km2 (39,887.36 sq mi)[3][4] |
التدفق | |
⁃ الموقع | Francisco de Orellana, Maynas, Loreto Region (near mouth) |
⁃ المتوسط | 7,147.761 m3/s (252,420.8 cu ft/s)[2] |
التدفق | |
⁃ الموقع | Mazán (Bella Vista), Loreto Region, Peru - 79,76 km upstream of mouth (basin size 100,518 km2 (38,810 sq mi)[3][5] |
⁃ المتوسط | (Period: 1991-2009)6,660 m3/s (235,000 cu ft/s)[6] 7,032.018 m3/s (248,333.4 cu ft/s)[7] |
⁃ أدنى تدفق | 3,250 m3/s (115,000 cu ft/s) |
⁃ أقصى تدفق | 11,200 m3/s (400,000 cu ft/s) |
التدفق | |
⁃ الموقع | Santa Clotilde, Maynas, Loreto Region, Peru - 256.2 km upstream of mouth (basin size 85,770 km2 (33,120 sq mi) |
⁃ المتوسط | (Period: 2002-2011)5,895 m3/s (208,200 cu ft/s)[3] (Period: 2001-2005)5,700 m3/s (200,000 cu ft/s)[8] |
التدفق | |
⁃ الموقع | Nueva Rocafuerte, Ecuador - 574.1 km upstream of mouth (basin size 26,879.7 km2 (10,378.3 sq mi)[9] (Period: 2001-2005)2,227 m3/s (78,600 cu ft/s)[8] |
⁃ المتوسط | (Period: 2001-2009)2,031 m3/s (71,700 cu ft/s) |
سمات الحوض | |
الروافد | |
- اليسرى | Aguarico, Coca, Tamboyacu |
- اليمنى | Yasuní, Tiputini, Curaray, Mazan |
نهر ناپو ( Napo River ؛ إسپانية: Río Napo) هو رافد نهر الأمازون وينبع من الإكوادور على جوانب براكين أنتيسانا وسينتشولاگوا و كوتاپاشي، شرق جبال الأنديز.
إجمالي طول النهر هو 1075 كم. The river drains an area of 103,307.79 km2 (39,887.36 sq mi). The mean annual discharge is 6,660 m3/s (235,000 cu ft/s)[9] (Mazán).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
الجغرافيا
Before it reaches the plains it receives a great number of small streams from impenetrable, saturated and much broken mountainous districts, where the dense and varied vegetation seems to fight for every piece of ground. From the north it is joined by the Coca River, having its sources in the gorges of Cayambe volcano on the equator, and also a powerful river, the Aguarico having its headwaters between Cayambe and the Colombia frontier. From the west, it receives a secondary tributary, the Curaray, from the Andean slopes, between Cotopaxi and the Tungurahua volcano. From its Coca branch to the mouth of the Curaray the Napo is full of snags and shelving sandbanks and throws out numerous canoes among jungle-tangled islands, which in the wet season are flooded, giving the river an immense width. From the Coca to the Amazon it runs through a forested plain where not a hill is visible from the river - its uniformly level banks being only interrupted by swamps and lagoons. From the Amazon the Napo is navigable for river craft up to its Curaray branch, a distance of about 216 mi (348 km), and perhaps a bit further; thence, by painful canoe navigation, its upper waters may be ascended as far as Santa Rosa, the usual point of embarkation for any venturesome traveller who descends from the Quito tableland. The Coca river may be penetrated as far up as its middle course, where it is jammed between two mountain walls, in a deep canyon, along which it dashes over high falls and numerous reefs. This is the stream made famous by the expedition of Gonzalo Pizarro.
حوض التصريف
التدفق
Napo River at Bellavista (km ~79,8) average (Q), dominante (Qd) discharge (m3/s) and sediment load (S – ton/year). Period from 1991/09–2009/08:[10]
Water year | Q | S | Qd | Water year | Q | S | Qd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1991/1992 | 5,667 | 28.608 | 6,009 | 2001/2002 | 5,979 | 32.431 | 6,335 |
1992/1993 | 7,104 | 47.718 | 7,447 | 2002/2003 | 5,669 | 32.154 | 6,312 |
1993/1994 | 8,013 | 67.159 | 8,583 | 2003/2004 | 6,148 | 41.916 | 7,054 |
1994/1995 | 6,055 | 34.801 | 6,525 | 2004/2005 | 6,456 | 37.953 | 6,767 |
1995/1996 | 5,956 | 34.017 | 6,463 | 2005/2006 | 6,143 | 34.77 | 6,523 |
1996/1997 | 6,262 | 38.258 | 6,790 | 2006/2007 | 6,535 | 40.344 | 6,942 |
1997/1998 | 9,839 | 105.956 | 10,354 | 2007/2008 | 6,615 | 40.832 | 6,977 |
1998/1999 | 6,839 | 51.48 | 7,686 | 2008/2009 | 7,428 | 52.504 | 7,749 |
1999/2000 | 6,725 | 49.735 | 7,576 | ||||
2000/2001 | 6,452 | 38.527 | 6,810 | Average | 6,660 | 44.953 | 7,161 |
Napo River at Bellavista (km ~79,8) average, minimum and maximum discharge (m3/s). Period from 2009/09 to 2022/08:[11]
Water year | Mean | Min | Max | Water year | Mean | Min | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009/2010 | 7,177 | 2016/2017 | 7,273.6 | 3,200 | 11,150 | ||
2010/2011 | 5,768.2 | 1,649 | 10,860 | 2017/2018 | 7,284 | 1,550 | 13,500 |
2011/2012 | 7,447.4 | 2,894 | 12,230 | 2018/2019 | 8,234 | 2,850 | 12,200 |
2012/2013 | 7,452.7 | 3,102 | 11,230 | 2019/2020 | 8,100 | 3,100 | 12,700 |
2013/2014 | 8,652 | 3,230 | 13,700 | 2020/2021 | 8,410 | 3,620 | 14,000 |
2014/2015 | 9,336 | 4,810 | 13,450 | 2021/2022 | 6,855 | 2,078 | 13,500 |
2015/2016 | 5,761 | 498.6 | 10,200 |
Napo River at Bellavista (km ~79,8) average, maximum, minimum and multiannual average (normal) discharge (m3/s) and anomaly (%):[12][13][14]
Mean | Max | Min | Normal | (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010/09 – 2011/08 | |||||
SEP | 2,620.5 | 3,089 | 1,969 | 5,121.2 | –49 |
OCT | 2,413.5 | 3,061 | 1,649 | 4,898.6 | –51 |
NOV | 3,818.7 | 4,778 | 2,696 | 5,595.1 | –32 |
DEC | 4,774.1 | 6,240 | 4,148 | 5,660.6 | –16 |
JAN | 3,604.2 | 5,001 | 2,174 | 4,580.7 | –21 |
FEB | 2,480.7 | 3,478 | 1,920 | 4,386.9 | –43 |
MAR | 4,753.4 | 7,127 | 3,790 | 5,824.1 | –18 |
APR | 9,206.8 | 10,240 | 7,865 | 7,502.4 | 23 |
MAY | 9,561.5 | 10,040 | 8,348 | 8,941.3 | 7 |
JUN | 10,193.8 | 10,860 | 8,821 | 9,422.9 | 8 |
JUL | 9,846.3 | 10,590 | 7,904 | 8,844.7 | 11 |
AUG | 5,944.6 | 8,658 | 3,758 | 6,610.8 | –10 |
Mean | 5,768.2 | 6,930 | 4,587 | 6,449.1 | –12 |
2011/09 – 2012/08 | |||||
SEP | 4,551.3 | 5,441 | 3,757 | 5,121.2 | 11 |
OCT | 5,344.9 | 6,995 | 2,894 | 4,898.6 | 9 |
NOV | 4,427 | 6,878 | 3,023 | 5,595.1 | –21 |
DEC | 6,536.8 | 9,160 | 5,205 | 5,660.6 | 15 |
JAN | 7,998.7 | 9,501 | 4,868 | 4,580.7 | 75 |
FEB | 6,536.8 | 8,302 | 5,155 | 4,386.9 | 49 |
MAR | 9,557.2 | 12,150 | 5,417 | 5,824.1 | 64 |
APR | 11,843.7 | 12,230 | 10,870 | 7,502.4 | 58 |
MAY | 10,322.7 | 10,790 | 9,702 | 8,941.3 | 15 |
JUN | 8,878.8 | 9,961 | 7,011 | 9,422.9 | –6 |
JUL | 8,189.3 | 9,228 | 7,197 | 8,844.7 | –7 |
AUG | 5,182 | 7,605 | 3,975 | 6,612.4 | –22 |
Mean | 7,447.4 | 9,020 | 5,756 | 6,449.2 | 15.5 |
2012/09 – 2013/08 | |||||
SEP | 5,037 | 7,822 | 3,249 | 5,096 | –1 |
OCT | 5,113 | 6,457 | 4,632 | 4,918 | 4 |
NOV | 4,130 | 5,660 | 3,102 | 5,567 | –26 |
DEC | 4,755 | 6,838 | 3,568 | 5,698 | –17 |
JAN | 7,589 | 9,183 | 3,854 | 4,723 | 61 |
FEB | 5,851 | 9,071 | 4,170 | 4,465 | 31 |
MAR | 10,060 | 10,740 | 9,127 | 5,973 | 68 |
APR | 9,405 | 10610 | 8,675 | 7,683 | 22 |
MAY | 8,322 | 10,570 | 6,932 | 8,999 | –8 |
JUN | 10,495 | 11,230 | 9,743 | 9,400 | 12 |
JUL | 9,675 | 10,410 | 8,402 | 8,817 | 10 |
AUG | 9,001 | 9,776 | 8,386 | 6,551 | 37 |
المتوسط | 7,452.7 | 9,030 | 6,153 | 6,490.8 | 15 |
Period of data | Multiannual average discharge | References |
---|---|---|
1930–2006 | 6,464 m3/s (228,300 cu ft/s) | Evaluación hidrológica de las cuencas amazonicas peruanas (HiBam/Senamhi/IRD, octubre 2011) |
1989–2010 | 6,360 m3/s (225,000 cu ft/s); Q-dominante 6,865 m3/s (242,400 cu ft/s) | Hydrodinamic and sediment transport modelling in a bend of Napo amazonian river: Morphodynamics and infrastructure implications (IAHR, 2015) |
1991–2009 | 6,660 m3/s (235,000 cu ft/s) | Estudio Binacional de Navegabilidad del Río Napo (Ecuador-Perú) |
1997–2015 | 6,734.2 m3/s (237,820 cu ft/s) | Assessing the performance of global hydrological models for capturing peak river flows in the Amazon basin (2019) |
2000–2011 | 6,461 m3/s (228,200 cu ft/s) | Línea Base Ambiental (Lahmeyer Agua Energia S.A.) |
2001–2012 | 6,758 m3/s (238,700 cu ft/s) | Preliminary Analysis of Potential for River Hydrokinetic Energy Technologies in the Amazon Basin |
2001–2009 | 6,369 m3/s (224,900 cu ft/s) | Estudio Binacional de Navegabilidad del Río Napo (Ecuador-Perú) |
2003–2009 | 6,855 m3/s (242,100 cu ft/s); Q-min 1,875 m3/s (66,200 cu ft/s); Q-max 13,020 m3/s (460,000 cu ft/s) | Modelado hidrologico distribuido de la Cuenca Amazonica Peruana utilizando preciptación obtenida por satelite, 2013 |
2004–2010 | 6,609 m3/s (233,400 cu ft/s) | Suspended sediment dynamics in the Amazon River of Peru |
2001–2005 | 6,976 m3/s (246,400 cu ft/s) | Sediment budget of the Napo River, Amazon basin, Ecuador and Peru |
2004–2006 | 6,267 m3/s (221,300 cu ft/s) | Sediment budget of the Napo River, Amazon basin, Ecuador and Peru |
2016–2017 | 9,338 m3/s (329,800 cu ft/s); Q-min 4,654 m3/s (164,400 cu ft/s); Q-max 13,200 m3/s (470,000 cu ft/s) | Hydrological modeling of the Peruvian-Ecuadorian Amazon Basin using GPM-IMERG satellite-based precipitation dataset[dead link] (2017) |
Confluence of Amazon River: 8,936 m3/s (315,600 cu ft/s) | Inventario y evaluación nacional de aguas superficiales (ONERN, 1980) | |
Bellavista: 7,032.018 m3/s (248,333.4 cu ft/s); Confluence of Amazon River: 7,147.761 m3/s (252,420.8 cu ft/s) | Rivers Network Archived 2022-02-21 at the Wayback Machine (2020) |
الروافد الرئيسية
انظر أيضاً
المراجع
- ^ Ziesler, R.; Ardizzone, G.D. (1979). "Amazon River System". The Inland waters of Latin America. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ISBN 92-5-000780-9. Archived from the original on 8 November 2014.
- ^ "Rivers Network". 2020. Archived from the original on 2022-02-21. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
- ^ أ ب ت "6_1-6_Linea Ambiental" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-06-07. Retrieved 2021-10-15.
- ^ "Rivers Network". 2020. Archived from the original on 2022-02-21. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
- ^ "Rivers Network". 2020. Archived from the original on 2022-02-21. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
- ^ "Estudio Binacional de Navegabilidad del río Napo". www.academia.edu.
- ^ "Rivers Network". 2020. Archived from the original on 2022-02-21. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
- ^ أ ب "Sediment budget of the Napo River, Amazon basin, Ecuador and Peru". www.academia.edu Hydrological …, 2009.
- ^ أ ب "03- Navegabilidad Rio Napo - Inf Fin - Vol III - Hidraulica Fluvial" (PDF).[dead link]
- ^ "Senamhi".
- ^ "EVALUACIÓN HIDROLÓGICA DE LAS CUENCAS AMAZÓNICAS PERUANAS – OCTUBRE 2011".
- ^ "EVALUACIÓN HIDROLÓGICA DE LAS CUENCAS AMAZÓNICAS PERUANAS – OCTUBRE 2012".
- ^ "BOLETIN EXTRAORDINARIO DE LA EVALUACIÓN HIDROLÓGICA Y PLUVIOMÉTRICA EN LA CUENCA AMAZÓNICA PERUANA – AGOSTO 2013".
- Pages using gadget WikiMiniAtlas
- Articles with dead external links from January 2022
- Short description is different from Wikidata
- Articles containing إسپانية-language text
- Coordinates on Wikidata
- Pages using infobox river with unknown parameters
- Pages using Lang-xx templates
- Articles with dead external links from October 2022
- روافد نهر الأمازون
- أنهار الإكوادور
- أنهار پيرو
- أنهار دولية في أمريكا الجنوبية
- Rivers of Loreto Region
- Geography of Napo Province
- Geography of Orellana Province
- Geography of Sucumbíos Province
- Upper Amazon
- صفحات مع الخرائط