أعمال الدلتا

Coordinates: 51°39′N 3°43′E / 51.65°N 3.72°E / 51.65; 3.72
(تم التحويل من Delta Works)
خريطة توضح أعمال الدلتا

أعمال الدلتا Delta Works، سلسلة من المشاريع الانشائية في جنوب غرب هولندا بهدف حماية منطقة شاسعة من الأراضي حول دلتا الراين-الميوز-شلت من جهة البحر. يتكون المشروع من مجموعة من السدود، الحواجز، الأهوسة، الأرصفة، والحواجز المقاومة للعواصف. والهدف الرئيسي من اقامة المشروع هو حماية الشاطئ الهولندي، وبالتالي تقليل عدد السدود التي دعت الحاجة إلى زيادة أعدادها.

أعلنت الجمعية الأمريكية للمهندسين المدنيين أعمال زويدرزي وأعمال الدلتا كإحدى من عجائب العالم الحديث السبعة.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

التاريخ

مصبات أنهار الراين والميوز وشلت كانت عرضة للفيضان على مر القرون. وبعد إنشاء أفسلويتدايك، بدأ الهولنديون في دراسة أقامة سدود على دلتا الراين-الميوز-شلت. وأُعِدت الخطط لتقصير الخط الساحلي وتحويل الدلتا إلى مجموعة من بحيرات المياه العذبة. وبتقصير الخط الساحلي، قل عدد الدايك المطلوب تقويتها.

Due to indecision and the Second World War, little action was taken. In 1950 two small estuary mouths, the Brielse Gat near Brielle and the Botlek near Vlaardingen were dammed. After the North Sea flood of 1953, a Delta Works Commission was installed to research the causes and develop measures to prevent such disasters in future. They revised some of the old plans and came up with the "Deltaplan".

Unlike the Zuiderzee Works, the Delta Plan's purpose is largely defensive and not for land reclamation.[1] The Delta Plan is a national programme and demands collaboration between the national government, provincial authorities, municipal authorities and the water boards. The plan consisted of blocking the estuary mouths of the Oosterschelde, the Haringvliet and the Grevelingen. This reduced the length of the dikes exposed to the sea by 700 kilometres (430 mi). The mouths of the Nieuwe Waterweg and the Westerschelde were to remain open because of the important shipping routes to the ports of Rotterdam and Antwerp. The dikes along these waterways were to be heightened and strengthened. The works would be combined with road and waterway infrastructure to stimulate the economy of the province of Zeeland and improve the connection between the ports of Rotterdam and Antwerp.


قانون الدلتا وإطار العمل المبدئي

Zeeland Bridge
Oosterscheldekering، أكبر السدود ال13 في مشروع أعمال الدلتا.

An important part of this project was fundamental research to come up with long term solutions, protecting the Netherlands against future floods. Instead of analysing past floods and building protection sufficient to deal with those, the Delta Works commission pioneered a conceptual framework to use as norm for investment in flood defences.

The framework is called the 'Delta norm'; it includes the following principles:

  • Major areas to be protected from flooding are identified. These are called "dike ring areas" because they are protected by a ring of primary sea defences.
  • The cost of flooding is assessed using a statistical model involving damage to property, lost production, and a given amount per human life lost.
  • For the purpose of this model, a human life is valued at €2.2 million (2008 data).
  • The chances of a significant flood within the given area are calculated. This is done using data from a purpose-built flood simulation lab, as well as empirical statistical data regarding water wave properties and distribution. Storm behaviour and spring tide distribution are also taken into account.

The most important "dike ring area" is the South Holland coast region. It is home to four million people, most of whom live below normal sea level. The loss of human life in a catastrophic flood here can be very large because there is typically little warning time with North Sea storms. Comprehensive evacuation is not a realistic option for the Holland coastal region.

The commission initially set the acceptable risk for complete failure of every "dike ring" in the country at 1 in 125,000 years. But, it found that the cost of building to this level of protection could not be supported. It set "acceptable" risks by region as follows:

  • North and South Holland (excluding Wieringermeer): 1 per 10,000 years
  • Other areas at risk from sea flooding: 1 per 4,000 years
  • Transition areas between high land and low land: 1 per 2,000 years

River flooding causes less damage than salt water flooding, which causes long-term damage to agricultural lands. Areas at risk from river flooding were assigned a higher acceptable risk. River flooding also has a longer warning time, producing a lower estimated death toll per event.

  • South Holland at risk from river flooding: 1 per 1,250 years
  • Other areas at risk from river flooding: 1 per 250 years.

These acceptable risks were enshrined in the Delta Law (Dutch: Deltawet). This required the government to keep risks of catastrophic flooding within these limits and to upgrade defences should new insights into risks require this. The limits have also been incorporated into the new Water Law (Waterwet), effective from 22 December 2009.

The Delta Project (of which the Delta Works are a part) has been designed with these guidelines in mind. All other primary defences have been upgraded to meet the norm. New data elevating the risk assessment on expected sea level rise due to global warming has identified ten 'weak points.' These have been upgraded to meet future demands. The latest upgrades are made under the High Water Protection Program.

تعديلات على الخطة أثناء التنفيذ

Scale model of the Maeslantkering

During the execution of the works, changes were made in response to public pressure. In the Nieuwe Waterweg, the heightening and the associated widening of the dikes proved very difficult because of public opposition to the planned destruction of important historic buildings to achieve this. The plan was changed to the construction of a storm surge barrier (the Maeslantkering) and dikes were only partly built up.

The storm-surge barrier

The Delta Plan originally intended to create a large freshwater lake, the Zeeuwse Meer (Zeeland Lake).[1] This would have caused major environmental destruction in Oosterschelde, with the total loss of the saltwater ecosystem and, consequently, the harvesting of oysters. Environmentalists and fishermen combined their efforts to prevent the closure; they persuaded parliament to amend the original plan. Instead of completely damming the estuary, the government agreed to build a storm surge barrier. This essentially is a long collection of very large valves that can be closed against storm surges.

The storm surge barrier closes only when the sea-level is expected to rise 3 metres above mean sea level. Under normal conditions, the estuary's mouth is open, and salt water flows in and out with the tide. As a result of the change, the weak dikes along the Oosterschelde needed to be strengthened. Over 200 km of the dike needed new revetments. The connections between the Eastern Scheldt and the neighboring Haringvliet had to be dammed to limit the effect of the salt water. Extra dams and locks were needed at the east part of the Oosterschelde to create a shipping route between the ports of Rotterdam and Antwerp. Since operating the barrier has an effect on the environment, fisheries and the water management system, decisions made on opening or closing the gate are carefully considered. Also the safety of the surrounding dykes are affected by barrier operations.

Environmental policy implementations

In an attempt to restore and preserve the natural system surrounded by the dykes and storm-surge barrier, the concept 'building with nature' was introduced in revised Delta Program updates after 2008. The new integrated water management plan not only takes into account protection against flooding, but also covers water quality, leisure industry, economic activities, shipping, environment and nature. Whenever possible, existing engineering constructions would be replaced by more 'nature friendly' options in an attempt to restore natural estuary and tides, while still protecting against flooding.[2] In addition, building components of the reinforcements are designed in a way that they support formation of entire ecosystems.[3] As part of the revision, the Room for the River projects, enabled nature to occupy space by lowering or widening the river bed.[4] In order to establish this, agricultural flood plains are turned into natural parks, excavated farmland is used for wild vegetation and newly excavated lakes and bypasses create habitats for fish and birds.[5] Along the coast, natural sand is added each year to allow sand to blow freely through the dunes instead of having the dunes held in place by planted vegetation or revetments.[6] Although the new plan brought along additional cost, it was received favourably.[بحاجة لمصدر] The re-considerations of the Delta Project indicated the growing importance of integrate environmental impact assessments in policy-making.

الوضع الحالي

المشروعات

The works that are part of the Delta Works are listed in chronological order with their year of completion:

Delta Works
Project Beginning Inauguration Image Function Watercourse Place
Stormvloedkering Hollandse IJssel (Algerakering) 1954 1958 1-Stormvloedkering Hollandse IJssel-Algerabrug--DSC 0179.jpg Flood barrier Hollandse IJssel (river) South Holland near Krimpen aan den IJssel
Zandkreekdam 1959 1960 Zandkreekdam-01.jpg Dam Zandkreek, Veerse Gat (Oosterschelde) Between Noord-Beveland and Zuid-Beveland on the east
Veerse Gatdam 1960 1961 Veerse Dam.jpg Dam Veerse Gat (Oosterschelde) Between Noord-Beveland and Zuid-Beveland on the west
Grevelingendam 1958 1965 Grevelingedam-01.jpg Dam Grevelingenmeer Between Tholen and Schouwen-Duiveland
Volkerakdam 1957 1969 Volkerakdam-01.jpg Dam Volkerak, Hollands Diep Meuse and Oosterschelde Between South Holland and Zeeland
Haringvlietdam 1958 1971 Haringvlietdam 2006 06 18-2.jpg Dam / Flood barrier Haringvliet (Rhine and Meuse) Between Voorne-Putten and Goeree-Overflakkee
Brouwersdam 1964 1971 Brouwersdam-02.jpg Dam Grevelingenmeer Between Goeree-Overflakkee and Schouwen-Duiveland
Markiezaatskade 1980 1983 Markiezaatskade-03.jpg Dam Scheldt–Rhine Canal, Markiezaatsmeer Between Zuid-Beveland and Molenplaat
Oosterscheldekering 1960 1986 Oosterscheldekering-pohled.jpg Flood barrier Oosterschelde Between Schouwen-Duiveland and Noord-Beveland
Oesterdam 1979 1987 Oesterdam-02.jpg Dam Oosterschelde, Scheldt–Rhine Canal Between Tholen and Zuid-Beveland
Philipsdam 1976 1987 Philipsdam-03.jpg Dam Oosterschelde Between Grevelingendam and Sint Philipsland
Bathse spuisluis 1980 1987 Spuisluis Bath-03.jpg Lock Volkerak, Markiezaatsmeer, Oosterschelde Bath, Zeeland
Maeslantkering 1988 1997 Maeslantkering.jpg Flood barrier Nieuwe Waterweg (Rhine) Downstream Rotterdam South Holland
Hartelkering 1991 1997 Spijkenisse - Hartelkering gesloten.jpg Flood barrier Hartelkanaal Near Spijkenisse, South Holland


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

معرض الصور

  • Hollandse IJssel Storm Barrier

    Hollandse IJssel Storm Barrier

  • Zandkreekdam[7]

    Zandkreekdam[7]

  • Veersegatdam[8]

    Veersegatdam[8]

  • Grevelingendam[9]

    Grevelingendam[9]

  • Volkerakdam[10]

    Volkerakdam[10]

  • Haringvliet sluices

    Haringvliet sluices

  • Brouwersdam[11]

    Brouwersdam[11]

  • Markiezaatskade[12]

    Markiezaatskade[12]

  • Eastern Scheldt Storm Surge Barrier

    Eastern Scheldt Storm Surge Barrier

  • Oesterdam[13]

    Oesterdam[13]

  • Philipsdam[14]

    Philipsdam[14]

  • Bathse Spuisluis[15]

    Bathse Spuisluis[15]

  • Hartel Barrier

    Hartel Barrier

  • Maeslant Barrier[16]

    Maeslant Barrier[16]

  • Maeslant Barrier

    Maeslant Barrier

انظر أيضا

المصادر

  1. ^ أ ب Ley, Willy (October 1961). "The Home-Made Land". For Your Information. Galaxy Science Fiction. pp. 92–106.
  2. ^ Kabat, Pavel; Fresco, Louise; Stive, Marcel J.F.; Veerman, Cees P.; van Alphen, Jos S.L.J.; Parmet, Bart W. A. H.; Hazeleger, Wilco; Katsman, Caroline A. (July 2009). "Dutch coasts in transition". Nature Geoscience. 2 (7): 450–451. Bibcode:2009NatGe...2..450K. doi:10.1038/ngeo572.
  3. ^ Deltares (2014). "Bouwen met de natuur in de praktijk". Delta Life. 1: 14–15.
  4. ^ Van Buuren, A; Ellen, G.J.; Warner, J.F. (2016). "Path-dependency and policy learning in the Dutch delta: toward more resilient flood risk management in the Netherlands?". Ecology and Society. 21 (4). doi:10.5751/es-08765-210443.
  5. ^ Rijcken, Ties (2015). "A critical approach to some new ideas about the Dutch flood risk system". Research in Urbanism Series. 3 (1).
  6. ^ DGW. "Nationaal Waterplan". rijksoverheid.nl. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu.
  7. ^ Beeldbankvenw.nl
  8. ^ Beeldbankvenw.nl
  9. ^ Beeldbankvenw.nl
  10. ^ Beeldbankvenw.nl
  11. ^ Beeldbankvenw.nl
  12. ^ Beeldbankvenw.nl
  13. ^ Beeldbankvenw.nl
  14. ^ Beeldbankvenw.nl
  15. ^ Beeldbankvenw.nl
  16. ^ Beeldbankvenw.nl

وصلات خارجية

مشاع المعرفة فيه ميديا متعلقة بموضوع Delta Works.

51°39′N 3°43′E / 51.65°N 3.72°E / 51.65; 3.72

تمّ الاسترجاع من "https://www.marefa.org/w/index.php?title=أعمال_الدلتا&oldid=2544797"