قالب:Unreliable source?
Usage
This template is intended to be used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement. It produces a superscripted notation like the following:
- It was actually written by Francis Bacon.
Articles tagged with this template will be categorized into Category:All articles lacking reliable references.
Place this template inline, {{Unreliable source|date=ديسمبر 2024}}
following the questionable claim (and any punctuation attached to it). The template should be placed outside the reference (<ref> ... </ref>
), within the article's text:
- Potentially controversial statement.
<ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=ديسمبر 2024}}
Next sentence.
Parameters
The template has the following optional parameters:
- date: should be set to the month and year when the article was tagged. Example:
{{Unreliable source?|date=ديسمبر 2024}}
- reason: a note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip. Keep it short (one sentence) as longer material belongs on the talk page. It is good to reiterate the reason in your edit summary. Example:
{{Unreliable source?|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=ديسمبر 2024}}
- sure or certain: if set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable. Please use this with a
|reason=
parameter, and only after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question. Example:{{Unreliable source|sure=y|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=ديسمبر 2024}}
NOTE: This parameter has an alias,|failed=
, which may make more grammatical sense when used with certain redirects like{{verify credibility}}
.
When to use and not use this template
This template should be used to express doubt about the credibility of a source.
This tag should not be used on unreliably sourced contentious statements about living persons; if the source is not reliable, the statement should be removed immediately.
For whole articles or article sections that rely on suspect sources, considering using the banner template {{refimprove}}
or {{refimprove section}}
, respectively, rather than individually tagging a large number of statements.
For sources promoting fringe theories and pseudo-science, the more specific template {{Unreliable fringe source}}
can be used. Even more specifically, flag improperly sourced medical claims with {{Unreliable medical source}}
.
This tag should not be used to indicate that the sourced material could not be found within a given source. In that case, {{failed verification}}
is a better template. For statements that have failed verification and have a questionable would-be source, consider removal of the source (and possibly the statement) over using both tags.
Redirects
The following may presently be used as shortcuts and aliases for this template:
- {{reliable source}}
- {{rs}}
- {{rs?}}
- {{vc}}
- {{unreliable source}}
- {{Unreliable source inline}}
- {{verify credibility}}
See also
Inline templates
{{Better source}}
, an alternative to{{Unreliable source|certain=y}}
; especially useful for tagging sources that are low-quality but not necessarily wrong{{Obsolete source}}
, for when a source has been surpassed by more recent works{{Unreliable fringe source}}
, for fringe sources{{Unreliable medical source}}
, for fringe medical sources in particular{{Primary source inline}}
, for misuse of primary source material{{Dubious}}
, for questionable claims that seem unlikely to be properly sourceable
More templates
{{Refimprove}}
, a banner template for flagging an entire article or section as needing better sourcing- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup/Verifiability and sources
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles
Policies, guidelines, essays, and wikiprojects
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
- Wikipedia:Citing sources, especially § Unsourced material
- Wikipedia:Independent sources
- Wikipedia:Third-party sources
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check
TemplateData
Unreliable source?
Used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement.
وسيط | وصف | نوع | حالة | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reason | reason | Note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip | نص | اختياري |
Certain? | certain sure failed | If set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable
| بولياني | اختياري |
Month and year | date | Month and year of tagging; e.g., 'January 2013', but not 'jan13'
| نص | مقترح |
The above documentation is transcluded from قالب:Unreliable source?/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |