تصنيف:مقالات الصيدلة حسب الجودة

مشروع معرفة الصيدلة  المقالات حسب الجودة     Refresh

???	الإجمالي
0	0

مقالات الصيدلة مقيـَمة حسب مقياس تقييم المعرفة 1.0.

لا تضع مقالات في هذا التصنيف. ضعهم في التصنيف المناسب بكتابة واحد من التالين في صفحة نقاش المقالة.

{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=FA|importance=XXX}}

{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=A|importance=XXX}}

{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=GA|importance=XXX}}

{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=B|importance=XXX}}

{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=Start|importance=XXX}}

{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=Stub|importance=XXX}}

These labels refer to this grading scheme:

جدول تقديرات جودة مقالات المشاريع المعرفية

• v
• t
• e

الرتبة	المواصفات	تجربة القارئ	اقتراحات تحريرية	مثال
FA	هذا المقال بلغ مرتبة featured article . مواصفات أكثر تفصيلاً هذا المقال يستوفي featured article criteria:المعرفة:Featured article criteria	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	L'incoronazione di Poppea (as of August 2010)
A	المقالة مرتبة جيداً وكاملة، وروجعت من قِبل مراجعين غير متحيزين من مشروع معرفي، مثل التاريخ العسكري, or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. مواصفات أكثر تفصيلاً هذا المقال يستوفي A-Class criteria: المعرفة:فريق تحرير الطبعة الأولى/التقدير/A-Class criteria	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer review may help.	102nd Intelligence Wing (as of March 2010)
GA	هذا المقال بلغ مرتبة good article. مواصفات أكثر تفصيلاً هذا المقال يستوفي good article criteria:المعرفة:Good article criteria	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Usain Bolt (as of November 2009)
B	The article is mostly complete and without major issues, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. مواصفات أكثر تفصيلاً المقالة تلبي six B-Class criteria:المعرفة:فريق تحرير الطبعة الأولى/التقدير/B-Class criteria	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the دليل الأسلوب and related دليل الأسلوب.	KV55 (as of November 2009)
C	The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup. مواصفات أكثر تفصيلاً The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.	Architecture of Sweden (as of May 2009)
Start	An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. مواصفات أكثر تفصيلاً The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.	Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more.	Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation.	Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. مواصفات أكثر تفصيلاً The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.	Geodia gibberosa (as of July 2009)
FL	المقالة وصلت إلى مرتبة القائمة المتميزة . مواصفات أكثر تفصيلاً المقالة تلبي مواصفات القائمة المتميزة:المعرفة:Featured list criteria	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3) (as of February 2009)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to لمقالات المعرفة، appropriately named and organized.	List of aikidoka (as of June 2007)