المعرفة:مشروع معرفة الصيدلة/التقييم
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
أسئلة يكثر طرحها
- كيف يمكن أن أطلب تقييم مقالتي؟
- First, make sure that the article is actually within the scope of the project (see below). If it is, you can list it in the قسم طلب تقييم أدناه.
- من الذي يقيم المقالات؟
- أي عضو في مشروع معرفة الصيدلة بإمكانه أن يضيف أو يغير تقييم مقالة، ولكن فضلاً اتبع الارشادات.
- لماذا لم يترك المراجع أية ملاحظات؟
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- أين يمكنني الحصول على المزيد من الملاحظات على مقالتي؟
- اتصل بمشروع معرفة الصيدلة who will handle it or assign the issue to someone. You may also list it for a مراجعة أقران.
- ماذا لو أني لا أتفق مع التقييم؟
- Relist it as a request or contact the project.
- أليست التقييمات غير موضوعية؟
- Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the مقياس الأهمية), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
إذا كان لديك أسئلة أخرى غير مذكورة هنا، فضلاً اطرحهم في صفحة النقاش لهذا القسم، أو اتصل بمشروع معرفة الصيدلة مباشرة.
توجيهات
An article's assessment is generated from the parameters in the {{ممص}} project banner on the article's talk page. Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed medicine articles (خاوية في نوفمبر 2009).
Syntax
You can learn the syntax by looking at the talk pages in edit mode and by reading the info below. This is the rating syntax (ratings are samples, change to what applies to the article in question):
{{WPMED |class= |importance=}}
- Displays the default banner, showing the project info and only ??? for the quality and importance parameters.
{{ممص|class=A|importance=Top}}
- Classed A with Top priority. All assessed articles should have quality and importance filled in.
تقدير الجودة
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{ممص}} project banner on its talk page:
{{ممص |class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:
- FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class medicine articles)
- A (adds articles to Category:A-Class medicine articles)
- GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class medicine articles)
- B (adds articles to Category:B-Class medicine articles)
- C (adds articles to Category:C-Class medicine articles)
- Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class medicine articles)
- Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class medicine articles)
- List (adds articles to Category:List-Class medicine articles)
- Template (adds templates to Category:Template-Class medicine articles)
- Dab (adds articles to Category:Disambig-Class medicine articles)
- Category (adds categories to Category:Category-Class medicine articles and automatically sets importance=NA)
- NA (for pages, such as portals or project pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class medicine articles). This means "non-article", NOT non-applicable.
تقدير الأولوية
An article's priority assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WPMED}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WPMED |importance=???}}
The following values may be used for the importance parameter:
- Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance medicine articles)
- High (adds articles to Category:High-importance medicine articles)
- Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance medicine articles)
- Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance medicine articles)
- NA (for pages, such as categories, templates, and disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-importance medicine articles). This means "non-article", NOT non-applicable.
معايير فريق العمل
لو أن مقالة وقعت ضمن اختصاص فريق عمل، استخدم الكود المذكور أدناه، لتستبدل taskforce بإسم فريق العمل المرغوب:
{{WPMED|taskforce=Yes |taskforce-imp=???}}
المتغيرات التالية يمكن استعمالها للمتغير taskforce، على أن تكون القيمة دائماً Yes:
- الصيدلانيات (تضيف مقالات إلى فريق عمل الصيدلانيات التصنيفات)
- الكيمياء الصيدلية (تضيف مقالات إلى فريق عمل الكيمياء الصيدلية التصنيفات)
- الكيمياء الدوائية (تضيف مقالات إلى فريق عمل الكيمياء الدوائية التصنيفات)
- العقاقير (تضيف مقالات إلى فريق عمل العقاقير التصنيفات)
- علم الأحياء الدقيقة (تضيف مقالات إلى فريق عمل علم الأحياء الدقيقة التصنيفات)
- العلوم ذات الصلة (تضيف مقالات إلى فريق عمل العلوم ذات الصلة التصنيفات)
- الممارسة الصيدلانية (تضيف مقالات إلى فريق عمل الممارسة الصيدلانية التصنيفات)
لفرق العمل التي تيتخدم تقييم أولويات خاص بهم، فإن متغير taskforce-imp يجب أن يُستخدم، مستبدلاً "taskforce" في taskforce-imp بواحدة من القيم المبنة أعلاه. القيم المقبولة لمتغيرات taskforce-imp هم نفسهم المقبولون لمتغير importance، المذكور آنفاً في #تقييم الأولوية.
If a taskforce is indicated, but a taskforce-imp is not given, some taskforces will use the WPMED importance, whereas others will rank it as unassessed importance for the taskforce.
مقياس الجودة
| الرتبة | المواصفات | تجربة القارئ | اقتراحات تحريرية | مثال | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 FA |
هذا المقال بلغ مرتبة featured article .
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Tourette syndrome | ||
 A |
المقالة مرتبة جيداً وكاملة، وروجعت من قِبل مراجعين غير متحيزين من مشروع معرفي، مثل التاريخ العسكري, or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
|
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer review may help. | Not currently used by this project | ||
 GA |
هذا المقال بلغ مرتبة good article.
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Fetal alcohol syndrome | ||
| B | The article is mostly complete and without major issues, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the دليل الأسلوب and related دليل الأسلوب. | Tuberous sclerosis | ||
| C | The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues. | جزر لانگرهانز | ||
| Start | An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more. | Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation. | AIDS-related lymphoma | ||
| Stub | A very basic description of the topic.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. | Acute care | ||
| FL |
المقالة وصلت إلى مرتبة القائمة المتميزة .
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3) (as of February 2009) |
||
| List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to لمقالات المعرفة، appropriately named and organized. | List of medical schools in the United States | ||
| Category | أي تصنيف يقع تحت هذا الصف. | Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. | Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. | تصنيف:طب | ||
| Disambig | Any disambiguation page falls under this class. | The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. | Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. | طبيب | ||
| Template | Any template falls under this class. The most common types of template include infoboxes and navboxes. | Different types of template serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. | Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. | Template:Infobox Disease | ||
| NA | Any non-article page that fits no other classification. | The page contains no article content, and is probably not useful to any casual reader. | Look out for mis-classified articles. Currently many NA-class articles need to be re-classified. | بوابة:الطب |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
مقياس الأهمية
The purpose of the importance rating is to direct the project's article improvement efforts towards the most important articles, and incidentally to provide a convenient shortlist of important topics for readers who are interested in medicine generally.
All diseases, conditions, medications, and tests are of "top" importance to people who are directly affected by them. The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability that the average reader of Wikipedia will look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics that are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to a student, expert or patient.
WPMED's specific guidelines for importance ratings are provided below. In making an assessment, it is often helpful to compare the article with others that already have the proposed rating. Links to each category are provided in the first column of this table:
| Label | Criteria | أمثلة |
|---|---|---|
| أهمية قصوى | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to medicine. Strong interest from non-professionals around the world. Usually a large subject with many associated sub-articles. Less than 1% of medicine-related articles achieve this rating. | درن أو سرطان |
| أهمية عالية | Subject is clearly notable. Subject is interesting to, or directly affects, many average readers. This category includes the most common diseases and treatments as well as major areas of specialization. Fewer than 10% of medicine-related articles achieve this rating. | Coeliac disease أو استئصال الثدي |
| متوسطة الأهمية | Normal priority for article improvement. A good article would be interesting or useful to many readers. Subject is notable within its particular specialty. This category includes most medical conditions, tests, approved drugs, medical subspecialties, well-known anatomy, and common signs and symptoms. | Cholangiocarcinoma أو شد عضلي |
| قليلة الأهمية | Article may only be included to cover a specific part of a more important article, or may be only loosely connected to medicine. Subject may be specific to one country or part of one country, such as licensing requirements or organizations. This category includes most of the following: very rare diseases, lesser-known medical signs, equipment, hospitals, individuals, historical information, publications, laws, investigational drugs, detailed genetic and physiological information, and obscure anatomical features. | Leopard syndrome أو Flynn effect |
| ل م | "ل م" تعني ليست مقالة. This label is used for all pages that are not articles, such as templates, categories, and disambiguation pages. (To mark an article as "needs assessed" or "not assessed," simply leave the importance parameter empty, like this: |importance= ) | مشروع معرفة الصيدلة |
إحصائيات
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .