إبدال صائت
| التغير اللفظي والقلب |
|---|
| Fortition |
| Dissimilation |
In linguistics, umlaut (from German "sound alternation") is a sound change in which a vowel is pronounced more like a following vowel or semivowel.[1]
The term umlaut was originally coined by Jacob Grimm in connection with the study of Germanic languages, as umlaut had occurred prominently in many of their linguistic histories (see Germanic umlaut).[2] While the common English plural is umlauts, the German plural is Umlaute.
Umlaut is a form of assimilation, the process of one speech sound becoming more similar to a nearby sound. Umlaut occurred in order to make words easier to pronounce.[3] If a word has two vowels, one back in the mouth and the other forward, it takes more effort to pronounce than if those vowels were closer together. Thus, one way languages may change is that these two vowels get drawn closer together. The phenomenon is also known as vowel harmony, the complete or partial identity of vowels within a domain, typically a word.
For example, in Old High German, the word gast 'guest' had the plural form gesti 'guests': the plural ending -i caused the vowel in the stem to be a front vowel e. This vowel alternation remained in the language, so that present-day Standard German displays the forms Gast [gast] – Gäste [gɛstə], although the final front vowel has been reduced to the central schwa vowel.[4]
The most commonly seen types of umlaut are the following:
- Vowel raising, triggered by a following high vowel (often specifically a high front vowel such as /i/).
- Vowel fronting, triggered by a following front vowel (often specifically a high front vowel such as /i/).
- Vowel lowering, triggered by a following non-high vowel (often specifically a low vowel such as /a/).
- Vowel rounding, triggered by a following rounded vowel (often specifically a high rounded vowel such as /u/), as in Icelandic.
All of these processes occurred in the history of the Germanic languages; see Germanic umlaut for more details. I-mutation is the most prominent of the processes, to the extent that it is often referred to simply as "umlaut".[5]
Similar processes also occurred in the history of the Celtic languages, especially Old Irish.[3] In this context, these processes are often referred to as affection.[6]
Vowel-raising umlaut occurred in the history of many of the Romance languages, in which it is normally termed Metaphony.[7]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
See also
- Umlaut (diacritic)
- Diaeresis (diacritic)
- Vowel harmony
- Metaphony
- Germanic umlaut
- I-mutation
- Two dots (disambiguation)
References
- ^ Hennings, Thordis (2012). Einführung in das Mittelhochdeutsche [Introduction to Middle High German] (in الألمانية) (3rd ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter. p. 56. ISBN 978-3-11-025958-2.
- ^ Cercignani, Fausto (1980). "Early "Umlaut" Phenomena in the Germanic Languages". Language. 56 (1): 126–136. doi:10.2307/412645. JSTOR 412645.
- ^ أ ب Hock, Hans Henrich (2021). Principles of historical linguistics (3rd revised and updated ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 75–77. ISBN 978-3-11-074632-7.
- ^ Wiese, Richard (1996). "Phonological vs. morphological rules: on German umlaut and ablaut". Journal of Linguistics. 32 (1): 113–135. doi:10.1017/S0022226700000785. S2CID 145351768.
- ^ Pompino-Marschall, Bernd (2016). "Umlaut". In Glück, Helmut; Rödel, Michael (eds.). Metzler Lexikon Sprache (in الألمانية) (5th ed.). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler Verlag. p. 733. ISBN 978-3-476-02641-5.
- ^ Russell, Paul (15 July 2014). An Introduction to the Celtic Languages (in الإنجليزية). London/New York: Routledge. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-317-89456-8.
- ^ Klausenburger, Jurgen (1987). "Review of Umlaut in Romance. An Essay in Linguistic Archeology. Giessener Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 12, CLIFFORD S. LEONARD JR". Romance Philology. 40 (3): 366–369. ISSN 0035-8002. JSTOR 44943385.