مملكة ناخون سي ثامرات
مملكة ناخون سي ثامرات Kingdom of Nakhon Sri Thammarat อาณาจักรนครศรีธรรมราช Nagara Sri Dharmaraja | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| القرن 13–1782 | |||||||||
| العاصمة | ليگور | ||||||||
| اللغات الشائعة | التاي (الرسمية حتى القرن 15) تامبرالينگا (الرسمية بعد القرن 15) | ||||||||
| الدين | بوذية الثرڤادا (السائدة)، الإسلام والهندوسية | ||||||||
| الحكومة | ملكية | ||||||||
| ملك | |||||||||
| الحقبة التاريخية | العصور الوسطى | ||||||||
• تأسيس مملكة للتاي | القرن 13 | ||||||||
• تابعة لسوختاي | ح. 1279–1298 | ||||||||
• تابع لأيوتايا | القرن 15 | ||||||||
• تابعة تاونگو | 1569 | ||||||||
• تابعة لأيوتايا | 1583 | ||||||||
| 1767 | |||||||||
• تابعة لثونبوري | 1770 | ||||||||
• خـُفـِّضت إلى مقاطعة راتاناكوسين | 1782 | ||||||||
| |||||||||
مملكة ناخون سي ثامرات (مملكة ليگور) (RTGS: Anachak Nakhon Si Thammarat) كانت واحدة من المدن الدول الرئيسية (mueang) المكونة للمالك السيامية سوختاي ولاحقاً أيوتايا وسيطرت على جزء كبير من شبه جزيرة الملايو. عاصمتها كانت المدينة ذات نفس الإسم ناخون سي ثامرات في ما هو اليوم جنوب تايلند.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
التأسيس وفترة سوختاي
Most historians identify the Tambralinga kingdom of Chinese records (existing c. 7th to 14th century) with a precursor of Nakhon Si Thammarat. During the late-1st and early-2nd millennium BC, Tai peoples expanded in mainland Southeast Asia. By the 13th century, they made Nakhon Si Thammarat one of their mueang (city states).[1] The exact circumstances of the Tai taking over the earlier Buddhist and Indianised kingdom at this location remain unclear. The Ramkhamhaeng stele of 1283 (or 1292) lists Nakhon Si Thammarat as the southernmost tributary kingdom of Sukhothai, probably ruled by a relative of King Ram Khamhaeng. Nakhon Si Thammarat's Buddhist Theravada tradition was a model for the whole Sukhothai kingdom.[2] Exemplary for the Southeast Asian Mandala model, the dependency towards Sukhothai was only personal, not institutional. Therefore, after Ram Khaemhaeng's death, Nakhon Si Thammarat regained its independence and became the dominant Thai mueang on the Malay peninsula.
فترة أيوتايا
In the Palatine law of King Trailok dated 1468, Nakhon Si Thammarat was listed as one of eight "great cities" (phraya maha nakhon) belonging to the Ayutthaya kingdom. Nevertheless, it maintained its own dynasty and had vassal states of its own, which it mediated to Ayutthaya[3] (again a typical feature of the Mandala model with its tiered levels of power). Under king Naresuan (r. 1590–1605) it became instead a "first class province" (mueang ek). However, the post of provincial governor was still quasi-hereditary and usually handed down from father to son within the old Nakhon Si Thammarat dynasty. It was the most important among Ayutthaya's southern provinces and enjoyed a primacy vis-à-vis the other provinces on the Malay Peninsula. Its role in overseas trade (involving Dutch and Portuguese merchants) resulted in the province's substantial wealth and contributed to a high level of confidence and claim of autonomy in relation to the central power.
During the Ayutthayan succession conflict of 1629, Nakhon Si Thammarat rebelled against the new king Prasat Thong. The usurper sent the influential Japanese adventurer Yamada Nagamasa with his mercenary force to quell the rebellion and made him governor and lord of Nakhon Si Thammarat for a short time.[4] Another insurrection of Nakhon Si Thammarat against the capital took place after the Siamese revolution of 1688 when the local ruler refused to accept the accession of usurper king Phetracha.[5]
فترتا ثونبوري و راتاناكوسين
After the fall of Ayutthaya in 1767, Nakhon Si Thammarat again enjoyed a short period of independence, including its subordinate provinces on the Malay peninsula, but was subdued by Taksin in 1769 on his mission to reunite Siam.[6] Under Rama I, the rank of the Lord of Nakhon Si Thammarat was demoted from a vassal ruler to a mere governor of a first-class province and his control over the Northern Malay sultanates (including Patani) was taken away, instead awarding them to the governor of Songkhla.[7] Nakhon Si Thammarat was supervised by the Kalahom (Minister of the Southern provinces).[8] In 1821 and 1831 however, kings Rama II and Rama III again tasked the governor of Nakhon Si Thammarat to quell rebellions in the Malay sultanate of Kedah.[9]
الاندماج في الدولة المركزية السيامية
With the thesaphiban reform of Prince Damrong Rajanubhab at the end of the 19th century the kingdom was finally fully absorbed into Siam. A new administrative entity named monthon (circle) was created, each supervising several provinces. Monthon Nakhon Si Thammarat, established 1896, covered those areas on the east coast of the peninsula, i.e. the provinces Songkhla, Nakhon Si Thammarat and Phatthalung.
للاستزادة
- Stuart Munro-Hay. Nakhon Sri Thammarat - The Archaeology, History and Legends of a Southern Thai Town. ISBN 974-7534-73-8
الهامش
- ^ David K. Wyatt (2004). Thailand: A Short History (Second ed.). Silkworm Books. p. 30.
- ^ David K. Wyatt (2004). Thailand: A Short History (Second ed.). Silkworm Books. pp. 35, 43–46.
- ^ David K. Wyatt (2004). Thailand: A Short History (Second ed.). Silkworm Books. pp. 72–74.
- ^ David K. Wyatt (2004). Thailand: A Short History (Second ed.). Silkworm Books. pp. 93, 96–98.
- ^ David K. Wyatt (2004). Thailand: A Short History (Second ed.). Silkworm Books. p. 108.
- ^ David K. Wyatt (2004). Thailand: A Short History (Second ed.). Silkworm Books. pp. 123–124.
- ^ David K. Wyatt (2004). Thailand: A Short History (Second ed.). Silkworm Books. pp. 141–143.
- ^ David K. Wyatt (2004). Thailand: A Short History (Second ed.). Silkworm Books. p. 146.
- ^ David K. Wyatt (2004). Thailand: A Short History (Second ed.). Silkworm Books. pp. 149, 156.